Mount Virtus

"Happy to come back to Michigan, but I miss the mountains!"

Ben on Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Home
  • About Ben
  • Mount Virtus?
  • Writer / Editor For Hire
  • What I’m Thankful For
  • Colorado Ballot Reviews
    • Colorado Ballot 2008
    • Colorado Ballot 2010
    • Colorado Ballot 2012
  • Archives
  • Passion and Purpose:
    The Rise & Fall of Al Gansee
Home Colorado Politics Counterproductive: Scott Renfroe Poorly Chose Rhetoric and Context

2/25/2009 By Ben 3 Comments

Counterproductive: Scott Renfroe Poorly Chose Rhetoric and Context

Denver Post columnist Al Knight has a fine piece today stating the arguments why the Colorado legislature should reject Senate Bill 88, the mandate to provide health-insurance benefits to same-sex couples: it embroils the state in legal battles, it violates the will of state voters, it has a negative impact on a tight budget, etc.

No, instead, Republican state senator Scott Renfroe opened his mouth during the SB 88 debate, and played right into the hands of the Left.

Explicitly biblical arguments may persuade on a personal level. But they do not directly inform the basis of our state policy, so using these arguments on the floor of the legislature at best requires an extraordinary deal of care, because they almost certainly will across as an imposition of less-than-informed personal opinion and values. In the end, the kind of rhetoric Senator Renfroe regrettably used is counterproductive: it lost votes to oppose SB 88, and it helped to tarnish the Republican brand by feeding into the Left’s narrative.

No doubt Senator Renfroe meant well when he delivered his speech. But if there’s a theme I have addressed numerous times here, it’s the shortcoming of the liberal philosophy of good intentions often falls short of good policy.

There is a time and a place to have an honest and compassionate discussion about the morality of homosexuality. In this case, the context and the rhetoric were poorly chosen.

I am not asking Renfroe or any other legislator to forfeit their deeply-held views, nor am I saying that these views ought not inform their actions in an official capacity. But greater deference has to be given to the setting, and greater consideration given to the consequences.

A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in pictures of silver. (Proverbs 25:11)

Filed Under: Colorado Politics, Cultural Conservatism, Fiscal Policy, General Tagged With: Al Knight, arguments, biblical arguments, Colorado, columnist, context, counterproductive, debate, Denver Post, good intentions, good policy, health-insurance benefits, homosexuality, imposition, Left, legal battles, legislature, morality, narrative, negative impact, oppose, personal opinion, poorly chosen, Republican, Republican brand, rhetoric, same-sex couples, Scott Renfroe, Senate Bill 88, state policy, state senator, state voters, theme, tight budget, values, will

Comments

  1. Paul says

    2/25/2009 at 3:58 pm

    Homosexuality may not be ‘natural’ in the way we look at reproduction, but there are always going to be exceptions to any rule. If you can be sexually aroused while making out with your same gender then maybe you can justify to yourself that it’s a choice. But in the end, people are going to fall in love with and be with the gender that they are predestined to. No amount of Christian re-programming camps can really overcome that, they can only make people feel regretful and absolutely shitty about themselves.

    I think the ability to have your own beliefs but let others revel in theirs is an important one. If we had a Muslim majority in America, and they wanted all women to cover their faces, would a Christian minority accept that? After all, we’re talking about a majority religion, so does that make their point of view right? In the end no one is going to admit their point of view / religion is wrong. It does no good to force your religious values on to others, just to hold tightly to them yourself.

    So just make sure you’re not making out with your same gender. Not that you’d want to anyway.

  2. Kevin J Jones says

    2/25/2009 at 10:28 pm

    Do Democrats and cultural radicals make any remarks that are capable of generating a media storm? Probably not with today’s media.

    The purpose of these Moments of Outrage is to trim the limits of acceptable opinion and to rope dull-witted conservatives into doing the trimming.

    Then in a few more years, it’s someone else’s turn to get cut.

    Parts of Justice Byron White’s 1986 opinion in Bowers v. Hardwick are probably already beyond the pale because the left is allowed to set the terms of debate.

  3. Ben says

    2/26/2009 at 7:36 am

    Well said. In our soundbite environment and “moment of outrage” media culture, our side does have to learn to play smarter, though.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inside

  • About Ben
  • Archives
  • Colorado Ballot Reviews
    • Colorado Ballot 2008
    • Colorado Ballot 2010
    • Colorado Ballot 2012
    • Colorado Ballot 2014
  • Mount Virtus?
  • Passion and Purpose:
    The Rise & Fall of Al Gansee
  • What I’m Thankful For
  • Writer / Editor For Hire

About Me

Ben DeGrow
Grateful and growing Christian, devoted husband and father of 3, public policy analyst, returned to Michigan by way of Colorado, conservative writer, lifelong learner, Detroit Tigers fan.

Recent Posts

  • Winter Travel & Home Improvement Tips for the Whole Family
  • Has The #MeToo Movement Helped Prevent Sexual Assaults on College Campuses?
  • Tips for Seasonal Travel with Kids/Family
  • How to Make Yourself More Appealing to Prospective Employers
  • 7 Ways To Parent A Child With ADHD

Colorado News

  • Colorado Senate News
  • Complete Colorado
  • Independence Institute
  • Loveland Politics
  • The Colorado Observer

National News and Politics

  • Drudge Report
  • Hot Air
  • National Review
  • Politico
  • Real Clear Politics
  • Reason
  • The Washington Times
  • TownHall
  • Wall Street Journal
  • Weekly Standard
  • World Magazine

Blogs Extraordinaire

  • American Thinker
  • David Harsanyi’s Blog
  • E!! The True Conservative Story
  • EIA Intercepts
  • Evangelical Outpost
  • Hugh Hewitt
  • Instapundit
  • LaShawn Barber
  • Lileks
  • Little Green Footballs
  • Michelle Malkin
  • NRO's The Corner
  • Power Line
  • Red State

Completing the Blogroll

  • Alarming News
  • Black Five
  • Blogs of War
  • Eduwonk
  • Flypaper
  • Fraters Libertas
  • Historical Conversations
  • IMAO
  • Jay P. Greene
  • Mike Anderson
  • Mullings
  • Professor Bainbridge
  • Right Thinking
  • Right Wing News
  • Right Wing Nuthouse
  • Shot in the Dark
  • Talking Points Memo
  • Virginia Postrel
  • Volokh Conspiracy

Christian Commentary et al.

  • Kevin Pierpont
  • Sharper Iron

Conservative and GOP Sites

  • Backbone America
  • Cal Thomas
  • Colorado Republican Party
  • Colorado Republican Study Committee
  • Dennis Prager
  • Denver Metro Young Republicans
  • Free Republic
  • Heritage Foundation
  • Jefferson County Republican Party
  • Mackinac Center for Public Policy
  • Mark Steyn
  • Michael Medved
  • Rush Limbaugh

Colorado Blogs

  • American Kestrel
  • Bob Agard
  • Colorado Charter Schools
  • Colorado Peak Politics
  • Colorado Pols
  • Colorado Right
  • Conservative Libertarian Outpost
  • Coyote Gulch
  • Ed Is Watching
  • Free Colorado
  • Jeff Crank Show
  • Mark Hillman
  • Patient Power
  • PirateBallerina
  • Protein Wisdom
  • Reagan Girl
  • Rocky Mountain Alliance 1.0 (Archive)
  • Rocky Mountain Alliance 2.0 (Archive)
  • Rossputin
  • Stop the ACLU Blog
  • The Spot (Denver Post)
  • We Stand Firm

Other Sites

  • Technorati
  • Word Press

Rocky Mountain Alliance 2.0

  • Reclaim the Blue
  • The Business Word
  • The Daily Blogster
  • View from a Height

To Contact Me:
bendegrow-at-gmail.com

Copyright © 2019 RSS Feed · WordPress · Log in