Mount Virtus

"Happy to come back to Michigan, but I miss the mountains!"

Ben on Social Media

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Home
  • About Ben
  • Mount Virtus?
  • Writer / Editor For Hire
  • What I’m Thankful For
  • Colorado Ballot Reviews
    • Colorado Ballot 2008
    • Colorado Ballot 2010
    • Colorado Ballot 2012
  • Archives
  • Passion and Purpose:
    The Rise & Fall of Al Gansee
  • Mary and Jacob: From the Forgotten Dust
Home clean government More Lies Attacking Colorado’s Amendment 47, Amendment 54

9/17/2008 By Ben 1 Comment

More Lies Attacking Colorado’s Amendment 47, Amendment 54

Face The State has a great story on a forum hosted by Lefty non-profit groups to “educate” about various initiatives on Colorado’s fall ballot.

As reported, a spokesman for the well-heeled group Protect Colorado’s Future lied directly to the audience about two initiatives his group opposes. First, he deceived attendees about the effects of Amendment 47, the Right-to-Work initiative:

“In places where they’ve been successful in passing these laws in other states, there is data that has shown workers make about $5,000 less per year and infant mortality is actually 21 percent higher,” said [spokesman Daniel] Klawitter on Amendment 47, the right-to-work measure.

But Kelley Harp, spokesman for the Amendment 47 campaign, questioned those statistics. “The facts are this: Amendment 47 will guarantee a fundamental freedom for all workers in Colorado, and there is strong evidence that right-to-work states perform better economically than non-right-to-work states.”

According to Harp, states that have adopted right-to-work laws have seen an increase in economic development and jobs. From 2001 to 2006, right-to-work states increased payrolls by 6.4 percent, vs. 2.9 percent in non- right to work states. These states have also seen lower unemployment rates.

Kelley Harp happens to be correct about the economic effects of Right-to-Work, as I documented before (here and here).

But Protect Colorado’s Future wasn’t finished with the lies:

Klawitter later answered questions about the impact of Amendment 54, but members of the campaign say some answers were factually inaccurate. The proposal, if passed by voters, would prohibit government contractors holding no-bid contracts from making campaign contributions to political parties and candidates. It would not, however, restrict individual contributions. A handout from the event read,”Amendment 54 would prohibit any person, or family member, or anyone who works on a government contract from contributing to a candidate and/or advocating for an issue at any level.”

One audience member wanted clarification on this point and asked, “Will Amendment 54 prevent individuals from contributing to candidates and campaigns? Since I’m in a union, I wouldn’t be able to give my money candidates I want to represent me?”

“Yes and yes,” Klawitter responded. Officials from the Amendment 54 campaign say Klawitter and his handout are wrong.

This is patently false – all one has to do is read the non-partisan Legislative Council’s blue book analysis of Amendment 54. The restrictions don’t affect “anyone who works on a government contract.” They affect:

‚the contracting entity’s officers, directors, or trustees; any individual who controls at least 10 percent of the shares of or interest in the entity; and in the case of a collective bargaining agreement, a labor organization and any political committees it creates to make campaign contributions.

We already knew that Protect Colorado’s Future is wedded to deception and more deception in its television advertising.

Now it seems they are also willing to lie straight to people’s faces.

Filed Under: clean government, Colorado Politics, General, Labor Tagged With: "educational" forum, Amendment 47, Amendment 54, ballot initatives, campaign contributions, Daniel Klawitter, deception, earnings, economic development, economic growth, employment, Face the State, government contractors, infant mortality, Kelley Harp, Lefty non-profit groups, lies, no-bid contracts, political campaigns, Protect Colorado's Future, right-to-work

Comments

  1. Colorado Jones says

    9/25/2008 at 10:43 pm

    So how was this an education roundtable if both sides of every ballot initiative weren’t represented? From this account it sounds like reading the blue book for an hour would have been more educational.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inside

  • About Ben
  • Archives
  • Colorado Ballot Reviews
    • Colorado Ballot 2008
    • Colorado Ballot 2010
    • Colorado Ballot 2012
    • Colorado Ballot 2014
  • Mary and Jacob: From the Forgotten Dust
  • Mount Virtus?
  • Passion and Purpose:
    The Rise & Fall of Al Gansee
  • What I’m Thankful For
  • Writer / Editor For Hire

About Me

Ben DeGrow
Grateful and growing Christian, devoted husband and father of 3, public policy analyst, returned to Michigan by way of Colorado, conservative writer, lifelong learner, Detroit Tigers fan.

Recent Posts

  • AI-Enhanced Cyberbullying: The Dark Side of Teen Innovation
  • My Baker’s Dozen of Top 2023 Reads
  • Common Learning Disabilities in Children
  • Tips to Teach Kids to Set and Achieve Goals
  • The Christmas Music Countdown You’ve Been Looking For: 2022 Edition

Colorado News

  • Colorado Senate News
  • Complete Colorado
  • Independence Institute
  • Loveland Politics
  • The Colorado Observer

National News and Politics

  • Drudge Report
  • Hot Air
  • National Review
  • Politico
  • Real Clear Politics
  • Reason
  • The Washington Times
  • TownHall
  • Wall Street Journal
  • Weekly Standard
  • World Magazine

Blogs Extraordinaire

  • American Thinker
  • David Harsanyi’s Blog
  • E!! The True Conservative Story
  • EIA Intercepts
  • Evangelical Outpost
  • Hugh Hewitt
  • Instapundit
  • LaShawn Barber
  • Lileks
  • Little Green Footballs
  • Michelle Malkin
  • NRO's The Corner
  • Power Line
  • Red State

Completing the Blogroll

  • Alarming News
  • Black Five
  • Blogs of War
  • Eduwonk
  • Flypaper
  • Fraters Libertas
  • Historical Conversations
  • IMAO
  • Jay P. Greene
  • Mike Anderson
  • Mullings
  • Professor Bainbridge
  • Right Thinking
  • Right Wing News
  • Right Wing Nuthouse
  • Shot in the Dark
  • Talking Points Memo
  • Virginia Postrel
  • Volokh Conspiracy

Christian Commentary et al.

  • Kevin Pierpont
  • Sharper Iron

Conservative and GOP Sites

  • Backbone America
  • Cal Thomas
  • Colorado Republican Party
  • Colorado Republican Study Committee
  • Dennis Prager
  • Denver Metro Young Republicans
  • Free Republic
  • Heritage Foundation
  • Jefferson County Republican Party
  • Mackinac Center for Public Policy
  • Mark Steyn
  • Michael Medved
  • Rush Limbaugh

Colorado Blogs

  • American Kestrel
  • Bob Agard
  • Colorado Charter Schools
  • Colorado Peak Politics
  • Colorado Pols
  • Colorado Right
  • Conservative Libertarian Outpost
  • Coyote Gulch
  • Ed Is Watching
  • Free Colorado
  • Jeff Crank Show
  • Mark Hillman
  • Patient Power
  • PirateBallerina
  • Protein Wisdom
  • Reagan Girl
  • Rocky Mountain Alliance 1.0 (Archive)
  • Rocky Mountain Alliance 2.0 (Archive)
  • Rossputin
  • Stop the ACLU Blog
  • The Spot (Denver Post)
  • We Stand Firm

Other Sites

  • Technorati
  • Word Press

Rocky Mountain Alliance 2.0

  • Reclaim the Blue
  • The Business Word
  • The Daily Blogster
  • View from a Height

To Contact Me:
bendegrow-at-gmail.com

Copyright © 2025 RSS Feed · WordPress · Log in