Mount Virtus

"Happy to come back to Michigan, but I miss the mountains!"

Ben on Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Home
  • About Ben
  • Mount Virtus?
  • Writer / Editor For Hire
  • What I’m Thankful For
  • Colorado Ballot Reviews
    • Colorado Ballot 2008
    • Colorado Ballot 2010
    • Colorado Ballot 2012
  • Archives
  • Passion and Purpose:
    The Rise & Fall of Al Gansee
Home General Huckabee Camp’s Washington Complaints: Nothing There

2/11/2008 By Ben 6 Comments

Huckabee Camp’s Washington Complaints: Nothing There

One of Saturday’s three Republican presidential caucuses stirred up some controversy, an unfortunate occurrence that needlessly poured fuel onto the Huckabee campaign’s conspiratorial fire, with his chairman reviving memories of Al Gore in Florida 2000:

Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee is crying foul after John McCain’s apparent victory in the Washington caucuses on Saturday.

Huckabee’s campaign released a statement Sunday saying it will be exploring all available legal options regarding the ”dubious final results.” Arizona Sen. McCain was announced as the victor in the caucuses with 26 percent of the vote to Huckabee’s 24 percent.

But Huckabee’s campaign chairman, Ed Rollins, said Luke Esser, Washington’s Republican Party chairman, chose to call the race too quickly for McCain.

Rollins said Huckabee was losing by 242 votes with 87 percent of the vote counted. He said there were another 1,500 or so votes that were apparently not counted.

”That is an outrage,” Rollins said.

Rollins said the Huckabee campaign’s lawyers will be on the ground in Washington soon to see why the count took so long, and why the vote-counting was stopped prematurely.

But as Ed Morrissey at Captain’s Quarters this morning follows up to show the results not changing:

With 94% of the precincts now reporting, McCain still leads by about the same percentage.

And as Pudge at Sound Politics reports from the ground in Washington State, here’s how much the presidential preference results even mean:

Nothing.

People from all over the media, from Josh Marshall to Tim Russert, and Mike Huckabee, are talking about the party declaring a winner, whether it was too soon, and so on. But what the party said about the results literally means nothing at all….

For Huckabee to be talking about legal challenges to a completely meaningless result shows that either he has no idea what the results actually mean (nothing), or he is just doing this for show.

My guess is the latter. The former Arkansas governor has had a better run for the nomination than most analysts would have predicted, but the media oxygen is escaping from his campaign. You don’t have to be a “math major” to see he cannot win the nomination, though maybe his continued presence in the race will have some effect of sending a conservative message to the GOP’s impending nominee, John McCain.

Meanwhile, the effects of Washington state’s real election scandal of 2004 live on.

Filed Under: General, National Politics Tagged With: , Al Gore, Captain's Quarters, Ed Rollins, election scandal, John McCain, Mike Huckabee, presidential primary, Washington caucus

Comments

  1. Terry Riegel says

    2/11/2008 at 10:12 am

    I actually was a math major. He can win the nomination. Not sure about your fuzzy math.

  2. Steven Nielson says

    2/12/2008 at 2:11 pm

    Ben – I agree with Terry. It is possible… difficult, but possible. In any case, Huckabee’s remaining presence in this race, as you said, is to ensure that the social conservative vote is prominent in the 2008 nominating process.

    Hugh Hewitt said on Feb 6th that he is glad Huck and Romney are still in the race, because taking your ball and going home after a loss is not how we should play. If we leave, the message is lost. The next day, Romeny was out, and Huckabee is left to carry the banner, ensuring that the conservative base of the GOP still has a voice.

  3. Ben says

    2/12/2008 at 2:26 pm

    Please notice, Steven, that I have not called for Huck to get out of the race. I’m glad he’s still in it, too, for the reason you mentioned and others. But I have yet to see anyone actually do a state-by-state breakdown and political analysis to show how Huck can win.

    I watched the YouTube. The reason why it was less than convincing is the utter lack of analysis of upcoming primary / caucus states and their apportionment of delegates. Though I have not looked at them all myself, trusted sources say most of them are not winner-take-all states, but rather proportional delegate states. This places a much greater burden on Huckabee to win an overwhelming percentage of the vote, which frankly, isn’t possible.

    But if there’s been a more precise analysis out there, please, I’d love to see it. Anyone who knows me knows I am not a McCain fan.

  4. Traditional Family Resources says

    2/13/2008 at 10:21 pm

    If another member of the Council on Foreign Relations wins the presidency, we all lose. The C. F. R. is nothing more than a front for the Papacies New World Order.

  5. Terry Riegel says

    2/14/2008 at 9:22 pm

    > Anyone who knows me knows I am not a McCain fan.

    I’m baffled.

  6. Ben says

    2/14/2008 at 10:24 pm

    Terry, Baffled by what? I’m not blinded by rose-colored glasses.

    If you want to go back and read through the archives of the past two or three months on this blog, you will see what I mean. Or just do a keyword search for any of the following:

    John McCain
    Mitt Romney
    Fred Thompson
    Mike Huckabee

    You will see what I mean.

    One doesn’t have to be a McCain fan to believe he’s a much better choice than the socialists on the other side. Would I like to see him make more solid moves & pledges to the conservative side? Yes. And I’ll keep arguing for it here. But I’m not going to throw mud on him to sate some primal urge.

    I believe it’s the grown-up thing to do. But I appreciate your devotion to Huckabee, even though it’s now abundantly clear that his chances of winning the nomination are indeed mathematically impossible.

    As I said above, fine by me if Huck stays in the race. But it would be better if more Republicans came to grips with reality.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inside

  • About Ben
  • Archives
  • Colorado Ballot Reviews
    • Colorado Ballot 2008
    • Colorado Ballot 2010
    • Colorado Ballot 2012
    • Colorado Ballot 2014
  • Mount Virtus?
  • Passion and Purpose:
    The Rise & Fall of Al Gansee
  • What I’m Thankful For
  • Writer / Editor For Hire

About Me

Ben DeGrow
Grateful and growing Christian, devoted husband and father of 3, public policy analyst, returned to Michigan by way of Colorado, conservative writer, lifelong learner, Detroit Tigers fan.

Recent Posts

  • Top Books I Read in 2020
  • The All-New Christmas Music Countdown: Bigger, Better and Brighter Than Ever
  • Does the USA Face Future Divorce?
  • Resources for Veterans and their Families Amid the COVID-19 Outbreak
  • How To Keep Your Children Engaged While Learning from Home

Colorado News

  • Colorado Senate News
  • Complete Colorado
  • Independence Institute
  • Loveland Politics
  • The Colorado Observer

National News and Politics

  • Drudge Report
  • Hot Air
  • National Review
  • Politico
  • Real Clear Politics
  • Reason
  • The Washington Times
  • TownHall
  • Wall Street Journal
  • Weekly Standard
  • World Magazine

Blogs Extraordinaire

  • American Thinker
  • David Harsanyi’s Blog
  • E!! The True Conservative Story
  • EIA Intercepts
  • Evangelical Outpost
  • Hugh Hewitt
  • Instapundit
  • LaShawn Barber
  • Lileks
  • Little Green Footballs
  • Michelle Malkin
  • NRO's The Corner
  • Power Line
  • Red State

Completing the Blogroll

  • Alarming News
  • Black Five
  • Blogs of War
  • Eduwonk
  • Flypaper
  • Fraters Libertas
  • Historical Conversations
  • IMAO
  • Jay P. Greene
  • Mike Anderson
  • Mullings
  • Professor Bainbridge
  • Right Thinking
  • Right Wing News
  • Right Wing Nuthouse
  • Shot in the Dark
  • Talking Points Memo
  • Virginia Postrel
  • Volokh Conspiracy

Christian Commentary et al.

  • Kevin Pierpont
  • Sharper Iron

Conservative and GOP Sites

  • Backbone America
  • Cal Thomas
  • Colorado Republican Party
  • Colorado Republican Study Committee
  • Dennis Prager
  • Denver Metro Young Republicans
  • Free Republic
  • Heritage Foundation
  • Jefferson County Republican Party
  • Mackinac Center for Public Policy
  • Mark Steyn
  • Michael Medved
  • Rush Limbaugh

Colorado Blogs

  • American Kestrel
  • Bob Agard
  • Colorado Charter Schools
  • Colorado Peak Politics
  • Colorado Pols
  • Colorado Right
  • Conservative Libertarian Outpost
  • Coyote Gulch
  • Ed Is Watching
  • Free Colorado
  • Jeff Crank Show
  • Mark Hillman
  • Patient Power
  • PirateBallerina
  • Protein Wisdom
  • Reagan Girl
  • Rocky Mountain Alliance 1.0 (Archive)
  • Rocky Mountain Alliance 2.0 (Archive)
  • Rossputin
  • Stop the ACLU Blog
  • The Spot (Denver Post)
  • We Stand Firm

Other Sites

  • Technorati
  • Word Press

Rocky Mountain Alliance 2.0

  • Reclaim the Blue
  • The Business Word
  • The Daily Blogster
  • View from a Height

To Contact Me:
bendegrow-at-gmail.com

Copyright © 2021 RSS Feed · WordPress · Log in