The middle of August can be the grueling days of a Colorado ballot initiative campaign. When you’re spending thousands of investor dollars trying to convince voters that a tax increase is not a tax increase, and your poll numbers are stagnating considerably below 50 percent, you need to find a laugh somewhere – for the sake of mental health, if nothing else. Taking out the pent-up angst with some jocular lampooning of your political opponents can be not only amusing but cathartic.
Let them go ahead, I say, if it makes them feel better while spending money trying to confuse Coloradans about the state of the economy and the nature of the tax increase. But when the pro-Ref C crowd seeks to be serious with its radio commercials, it can be even funnier. Their new ad tries to depict their opponent as a “taxpayer-subsidized” think tank that occupies the “ivory tower,” etc. I thought the ads had to be referring to the Independence Institute, since there’s no other think tank I know that has pointed out the Ref C Emperor is wearing no clothes. But this lame characterization then not only suffers from being truth-challenged but also from being utterly ridiculous. And why are the great proponents of the so-called fiscal fix diving deep into negativism, hurling misleading and absurd attacks at their opponents rather than making the case for their referendum? It surely isn’t the sign of a healthy campaign.
Meanwhile, Colorado’s small business owners have taken a stand against Referendum C. Another group has pointed out its economic folly, which makes the need for a good laugh among the tax increase supporters all the more urgent.
Curious Stranger says
“since there’s no other think tank I know that has pointed out the Ref C Emperor is wearing no clothes”
Funny that. I wonder why?
Ben says
Oh, maybe because they’re either blind or in bed with the special interests. I try not to make policy judgments based on what the “crowd” thinks. You know, if everyone were jumping off a bridge….
Maybe someone should ask why the tax increase consistently polls less than 50 percent if it’s so obviously the right thing to do…
Curious Stranger says
Perhaps we can ask John Andrews why it was the right thing to do when he actually had the responsibility of governing?
Curious Stranger says
Also, is it alright to be in bed with the Big Business special interest? Or is it only the other special interests that are bad?