Archive for February, 2006

What You Need to Know about Colorado Dems

Posted on February 6th, 2006 in Colorado Politics, General | 2 Comments »

Some brief Monday morning thoughts:

Colorado Democrats are under a lot of pressure and influence from the aging dinosaur of organized labor, which despite its “pro-worker” rhetoric, champions some legislation bound to have an adverse effect on working families. Working families who shop at – or even work at – say, Wal Mart. Did they take a poll of the giant retailer’s employees before deciding to support a measure that would mandate a certain percentage of payroll on health care benefits? This is horrible legislation that would primarily benefit the union bosses and their organizing buddies, and could hurt the many student and second-income employees who already are covered by someone else’s health insurance and choose to work at Wal Mart for the extra take-home earnings.

But none of the organized labor lobby is strong as Colorado’s public employee unions, from whom other union bosses might get the idea to enforce the automatic collection of union dues from employee paychecks by legislation. Or with a Democrat governor in the statehouse they likely will seek to undo Bill Owens’ 2001 executive order outlawing political deductions from state employee paychecks.

Speaking of Democrats who want to be governor, it looks like Mayor John Hickenlooper finally will decide to cast his hat in the ring. To which I reply: Good. One can only take so much anticipatory drooling from the other side of the aisle. They have deluded themselves into believing that Hick is the unbeatable statewide candidate they’ve been longing for to lead the “Blue State” charge. Let the real campaigning begin.

Update: Well, surprise, surprise… Hick is not running, and this time we can safely assume that “No” really does mean “No.” Hick or Ritter or Alice Madden, it doesn’t matter: the GOP should be odds-on favorites to hold on to the Statehouse. And having staked so much on a rumor, the Dems sure look rudderless now. The Dead Guvs’ best efforts to breathe life into the state Dems’ fall campaign have fallen short. One of many questions arising now: where is the Big Four’s money going to go?

Update II: A media release from the Marc Holtzman campaign indicates that John Hickenlooper made the classy gesture of giving Marc a personal phone call notifying him of the decision prior to his official announcement. Still awaiting word from the Beauprez camp, but there is every reason to believe Hick extended the gesture to all the other announced candidates in the race. Best wishes to Hick in his continued mayoral tenure.

When is a Fight Not a Fight?

Posted on February 2nd, 2006 in Colorado Politics, Education, General | No Comments »

Berny Morson of the Rocky Mountain News reports on a briefing yesterday put on by Pam Benigno of the Independence Institute. Months of interviews and research have gone into the still-ongoing findings about how fights and assaults are reported on Colorado’s School Accountability Reports (SAR). The short story of a complicated topic? Reporting violent incidents in schools is a lot closer to obscure legal technicality than common sense. Perhaps you remember the story of a student murdered in a Denver high school cafeteria, recently reported as a “Dangerous Weapons” incident. This anecdote is only the most extreme and striking of many points of confusion on the SAR.

Parents and taxpayers deserve a clearer and fairer picture of the atmosphere of their schools, rather than the distorted view currently presented. The fault lies with the current law, not with school officials or law enforcement. Republican Senator Ed Jones of Colorado has introduced Senate Bill 55, which will take a couple important positive steps in improving the way assaults and fights are reported in schools. His bill will be heard in the Senate Education Committee this afternoon. It will be interesting to see how the proposed legislation fares in the hands of a Democratic majority heavily influenced by interest groups keen on seeing the SAR disappear or, at least, be stripped of any useful qualities.